While the Court of Chancery will frequently enjoin parties from engaging in unfair competitive activities, the standard for obtaining preliminary injunctive relief remains high. It is important for parties seeking injunctive relief to be able to provide the court with specific, admissible evidence of unfair competitive activities. Generalized allegations normally will be insufficient to allow the court to grant relief. Take for example a recent case involving the purchaser of a company’s assets who sought to enforce a noncompete against one of the company’s former employees.
In that case, Geovesi Holdings, Ltd. purchased certain assets of Earthwater Global, LLC as part of a court-ordered liquidation. The purchased assets include “all employment, non-disclosure agreements and confidentiality agreements entered into by [EW Global].” Following the sale, Geovesi filed suit in Chancery Court against one of EW Global’s former employees, Robert Bisson, to enforce noncompete and non-solicitation covenants in his employment agreement. There also was pending litigation between Bisson and Geovesi in Virginia and an arbitration proceeding.
As evidence of Bisson’s competitive activities, Geovesi relied exclusively on allegations in Bisson’s Virginia pleadings that he competed with Geovesi. The Court noted that while these generalized allegations are admissible evidence of competition, they did not provide a sufficient evidentiary foundation to support injunctive relief.
The Court also found that Geovesi’s allegations that Bisson wrongfully solicited its employees was too general to support injunctive relief. As evidence, Geovesi had pointed to names mentioned on Bisson’s website and made generalized allegations about other solicitation efforts. Bisson, on the other hand, responded with an affidavit explaining the names listed on his website and denying any prohibited solicitations. The Court found that on the present record it could not predict with any degree of confidence how this issue would be resolved at trial, making it inappropriate to issue injunctive relief.
Genovesi Holdings Ltd v. Bisson, 6780-VCL, (Del. Ch. 9/19/2011).